The Money and Pensions Service's Debt Insight Manager, Paul Das, shares what we know about people using Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) products, our concerns about what is currently offered by some providers and discusses how this product could fit within the regulated credit landscape.
There are various estimates of the size of BNPL usage in the UK, but what all analysts and market commentators agree on is that its use is growing rapidly. FinTech companies led the charge in the UK, picking up Generation Z and Millennial customers born in the 80s and 90s.
Growing up in an online world, these consumers were attracted by the ease of using this payment method, which is based on paying back credit in one or a series of interest free instalments over a fixed time period.
High-street lenders are now joining the market, either by designing their own versions of the ‘standard’ BNPL offer or adapting existing credit products to incorporate particular features.
The range of products available to purchase by means of BNPL is diversifying, with some providers now targeting their offer at those buying essential items, most notably groceries.
We published a blog about the need for debt advice in the UK based on analysis of our Debt Needs Survey. Looking at the data in more depth gives us insights about people who told us they have used BNPL in the last 6 months.
We found that BNPL users tended to be younger – 64% were under forty. This isn’t surprising – promotion of BNPL to date has typically targeted younger consumers buying fashion and lifestyle products, and BNPL is an accessible, immediate form of short-term credit for people under twenty-five who may have a thin credit file. As BNPL moves more mainstream, this may change.
BNPL has attracted people with a range of different household incomes. There’s a slight skew towards households with an income of under £20,000 per annum, but BNPL definitely isn’t focussed on low-income households. What we wanted to understand was the balance between customers across all providers between:
Taking all BNPL users together they do differ from the UK population in terms of their financial resilience.
They’re more susceptible to mismatches between bills arriving and the date that they receive their income. So, the ability to spread payments over time would make BNPL attractive.
We’ve created a new measure of a person’s need for debt advice. Analysing BNPL users according to this indicator, gives us the balance figures mentioned earlier:
This shows that nearly 4 in 10 of the BNPL users we interviewed need debt advice and a similar number are at risk of getting into that situation. That leaves just over a quarter for whom BNPL fits in well with their financial commitments.
MaPS recognises that there is already good practice in the BNPL provider market. It can be a cheaper credit option for people who make all the payments when they are due and is more accessible for those who have a thin credit record.
But as the graphic above shows, BNPL customers include a substantial number who are already in problem debt. This suggests that up until now, BNPL has not been the right choice for some and there have not been sufficient checks to prevent this.
Some areas of concern:
BNPL is growing in popularity at a time when many UK consumers are facing increasing pressures from the rising cost of living. Demand for credit is rising sharply and some people are faced with difficult choices about what they can buy and how they pay for it. MaPS, including through its MoneyHelper brand, wants to help people make informed choices looking across all the forms of credit available from high street lenders, BNPL providers and community finance products offered by Credit Unions and Community Development Finance Institutions.
In order to protect and improve people’s overall financial wellbeing, regulation of BNPL should address:
We welcome the plans to tackle these issues, as published by the Government earlier this week.
We will continue to monitor the use of BNPL using our Debt Need Survey as it evolves and use the insights that we gain to inform our policy positions.